↓ Skip to main content

Early osteoarthritis of the knee

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
Title
Early osteoarthritis of the knee
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00167-016-4068-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henning Madry, Elizaveta Kon, Vincenzo Condello, Giuseppe M. Peretti, Matthias Steinwachs, Romain Seil, Massimo Berruto, Lars Engebretsen, Giuseppe Filardo, Peter Angele

Abstract

There is an increasing awareness on the importance in identifying early phases of the degenerative processes in knee osteoarthritis (OA), the crucial period of the disease when there might still be the possibility to initiate treatments preventing its progression. Early OA may show a diffuse and ill-defined involvement, but also originate in the cartilage surrounding a focal lesion, thus necessitating a separate assessment of these two entities. Early OA can be considered to include a maximal involvement of 50 % of the cartilage thickness based on the macroscopic ICRS classification, reflecting an OARSI grade 4. The purpose of this paper was to provide an updated review of the current status of the diagnosis and definition of early knee OA, including the clinical, radiographical, histological, MRI, and arthroscopic definitions and biomarkers. Based on current evidence, practical classification criteria are presented. As new insights and technologies become available, they will further evolve to better define and treat early knee OA. Level of evidence IV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 330 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Other 25 8%
Researcher 19 6%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 110 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Engineering 22 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 126 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,118,859
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#470
of 2,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,485
of 299,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#13
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.