↓ Skip to main content

A Case for “Reverse One-Child” Policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the Link Between Education Costs and Lowest-Low Fertility

Overview of attention for article published in Population Research and Policy Review, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
A Case for “Reverse One-Child” Policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the Link Between Education Costs and Lowest-Low Fertility
Published in
Population Research and Policy Review, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11113-016-9390-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Poh Lin Tan, S. Philip Morgan, Emilio Zagheni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 14%
Psychology 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,104,512
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Population Research and Policy Review
#246
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,593
of 303,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Research and Policy Review
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.