Title |
Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade
|
---|---|
Published in |
Empirical Economics, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00181-012-0576-2 |
Authors |
Estrella Gómez-Herrera |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 248 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 21% |
Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
Researcher | 22 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
Other | 42 | 16% |
Unknown | 50 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 144 | 56% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
Engineering | 5 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 7% |
Unknown | 56 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,937,541
of 23,692,259 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Economics
#119
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,285
of 162,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Economics
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,692,259 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.