| Title |
Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-012-2281-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kong Hwee Lee, Wai Mun Yue, William Yeo, Henry Soeharno, Seang Beng Tan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,399,265
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#218
of 4,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,321
of 160,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.