| Title |
Health Status After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne J. Baron, Elizabeth A. Magnuson, Michael Lu, Kaijun Wang, Khaja Chinnakondepalli, Michael Mack, Vinod H. Thourani, Susheel Kodali, Raj Makkar, Howard C. Herrmann, Samir Kapadia, Vasilis Babaliaros, Mathew R. Williams, Dean Kereiakes, Alan Zajarias, Maria C. Alu, John G. Webb, Craig R. Smith, Martin B. Leon, David J. Cohen, PARTNER 3 Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Qatar | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 49% |
| Scientists | 18 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#285,123
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#640
of 16,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,944
of 360,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#19
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.