| Title |
The best wildflowers for wild bees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-019-00180-8 |
| Authors |
Rachel N. Nichols, Dave Goulson, John M. Holland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 57 | 37% |
| United States | 11 | 7% |
| Ireland | 9 | 6% |
| Portugal | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 57 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 133 | 86% |
| Scientists | 18 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#230,198
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#6
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,700
of 359,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.