↓ Skip to main content

Harm should not be a necessary criterion for mental disorder: some reflections on the DSM-5 definition of mental disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Harm should not be a necessary criterion for mental disorder: some reflections on the DSM-5 definition of mental disorder
Published in
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11017-019-09499-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Cristina Amoretti, Elisabetta Lalumera

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 14 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,819,054
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#162
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,139
of 348,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.