You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Preclinical murine platform to evaluate therapeutic countermeasures against radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1906611116 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul B. Romesser, Amanda S. Kim, Jeho Jeong, Allison Mayle, Lukas E. Dow, Scott W. Lowe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 22% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 29% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,660,875
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#58,303
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,336
of 350,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#642
of 915 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 915 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.