| Title |
Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease JACC State-of-the-Art Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark J. Sarnak, Kerstin Amann, Sripal Bangalore, João L. Cavalcante, David M. Charytan, Jonathan C. Craig, John S. Gill, Mark A. Hlatky, Alan G. Jardine, Ulf Landmesser, L. Kristin Newby, Charles A. Herzog, Michael Cheung, David C. Wheeler, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Thomas H. Marwick, Conference Participants, Debasish Banerjee, Carlo Briguori, Tara I. Chang, Chien-Liang Chen, Christopher R. deFilippi, Xiaoqiang Ding, Charles J. Ferro, Jagbir Gill, Mario Gössl, Nicole M. Isbel, Hideki Ishii, Meg J. Jardine, Philip A. Kalra, Günther Laufer, Krista L. Lentine, Kevin Lobdell, Charmaine E. Lok, Gérard M. London, Jolanta Małyszko, Patrick B. Mark, Mohamed Marwan, Yuxin Nie, Patrick S. Parfrey, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Helen Pilmore, Wajeh Y. Qunibi, Paolo Raggi, Marcello Rattazzi, Patrick Rossignol, Josiah Ruturi, Charumathi Sabanayagam, Catherine M. Shanahan, Gautam R. Shroff, Rukshana Shroff, Angela C. Webster, Daniel E. Weiner, Simon Winther, Alexander C. Wiseman, Anthony Yip, Alexander Zarbock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 10% |
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 10 | 7% |
| Mexico | 6 | 4% |
| Colombia | 6 | 4% |
| Argentina | 6 | 4% |
| Dominican Republic | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 14% |
| Scientists | 14 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 404 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 9% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 80 | 20% |
| Unknown | 168 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 46 | 11% |
| Unknown | 179 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#406,247
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#974
of 16,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,742
of 363,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#33
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.