You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The “Smart Work” Myth: How Bureaucratic Inertia and Workplace Culture Stymied Digital Transformation in the Relocation of South Korea’s Capital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asian Studies Review, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10357823.2019.1663786 |
| Authors |
Joon-Young Hur, Wonhyuk Cho, Geon Lee, Sarah Hendrica Bickerton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 3 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 356 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 7% |
| Researcher | 23 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 84 | 24% |
| Unknown | 137 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 59 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 57 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 34 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 143 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,372,660
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#91
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,785
of 350,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.