↓ Skip to main content

六甲山系における地震後の降雨による崩壊地の拡大について

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
六甲山系における地震後の降雨による崩壊地の拡大について
Published in
Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, March 1996
DOI 10.11475/sabo1973.48.6_15
Authors

冨田 陽子, 桜井 亘, 中 庸充

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,669,704
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering
#1
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#494
of 26,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them