| Title |
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Raymond Geis, Adrian Brady, Carol C. Wu, Jack Spencer, Erik Ranschaert, Jacob L. Jaremko, Steve G. Langer, Andrea Borondy Kitts, Judy Birch, William F. Shields, Robert van den Hoven van Genderen, Elmar Kotter, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Tessa S. Cook, Matthew B. Morgan, An Tang, Nabile M. Safdar, Marc Kohli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| Austria | 6 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 67 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 15% |
| Engineering | 17 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 74 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#745,598
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#17
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,070
of 363,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.