↓ Skip to main content

Integration of eDNA‐Based Biological Monitoring within the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Streamgage Network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Water Resources Association, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of eDNA‐Based Biological Monitoring within the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Streamgage Network
Published in
Journal of the American Water Resources Association, September 2019
DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12800
Authors

David S. Pilliod, Matthew B. Laramie, Dorene MacCoy, Scott Maclean

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 24%
Environmental Science 10 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,854,022
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#348
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,972
of 361,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Water Resources Association
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.