↓ Skip to main content

Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and its association with refractive error in Chinese children: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and its association with refractive error in Chinese children: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/ceo.12764
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng‐Tian Kang, Shi‐Ming Li, He Li, Lei Li, Si‐Yuan Li, Bi‐Dan Zhu, Yi‐Qin Guo, Bo Meng, Yun‐Yun Sun, Anran Ran, Yi‐Peng Wang, Luo‐Ru Liu, Si‐Yan Zhan, Ravi Thomas, Ningli Wang

Abstract

To report the thickness of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) in Chinese children and examine it's association with refractive error, axial length and optic disc parameters. Population based, cross-sectional study. A total of 2893 seven-year-old children from 11 randomly selected primary schools in Anyang, central China. Participants underwent ophthalmic examinations including optical biometry, cycloplegic autorefraction, and SD-OCT. RNFL thickness in 16 radial sections, cycloplegic spherical equivalent, axial length. The mean (SD) average RNFL thickness was 102.01(8.02)µm. The average RNFL thickness decreased with smaller disc area (r = 0.18, R(2)  = 0.03, P < 0.0001), bigger cup area (r = -0.11, R(2)  = 0.01, P < 0.0001), smaller rim area (r = 0.28, R(2)  = 0.08, P < 0.0001), smaller nerve head volume (r = 0.27, R(2)  = 0.07, P < 0.0001), longer axial length (r = -0.15, R(2)  = 0.02, P < 0.0001) and a negative spherical equivalent (r = 0.11, R(2)  = 0.01, P < 0.0001). Hyperopic children had a thicker RNFL than emmetropic children [102.45(8.13)µm vs. 100.81 (7.18)µm, P < 0.001]. Myopic children had thinner RNFL than emmetropic children [99.17 (7.69)µm vs. 100.81 (7.18)µm, P < 0.05]. RNFL thickness decreased with increasing axial length, higher myopia, bigger cup area, smaller disc and rim area, and a smaller nerve head volume but the coefficient of determination for all these associations was small. The RNFL in myopes was significantly thinner than emmetropes or hyperopes, but with small absolute differences. The study provides RNFL values for healthy 7-year-old Chinese children. Follow up of this cohort to observe the change of RNFL thickness with myopia and possible change in detected associations with age is planned.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 16 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 18 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#1,072
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,747
of 348,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#20
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.