Title |
Enhancing the Informed Consent Process Using Shared Decision Making and Consent Refusal Data from the CLEAR III Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neurocritical Care, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12028-019-00860-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amanda L. Porter, James Ebot, Karen Lane, Lesia H. Mooney, Amy M. Lannen, Eugene M. Richie, Rachel Dlugash, Steve Mayo, Thomas G. Brott, Wendy Ziai, William D. Freeman, Daniel F. Hanley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
France | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Researcher | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
Psychology | 3 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,240,390
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#573
of 1,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,767
of 348,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.