| Title |
Model-Based Economic Evaluation of Ceritinib and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatments for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Therapy, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12325-019-01103-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ye Peng, Fang Ma, Chongqing Tan, Xiaomin Wan, Lidan Yi, Liubao Peng, Xiaohui Zeng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,031,242
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,538
of 2,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,688
of 349,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#43
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.