| Title |
T-2 toxin neurotoxicity: role of oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-019-02577-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chongshan Dai, Xilong Xiao, Feifei Sun, Yuan Zhang, Daniel Hoyer, Jianzhong Shen, Shusheng Tang, Tony Velkov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,477,246
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#948
of 2,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,058
of 349,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.