Title |
Differences in Transient Thermal Response of Commercial Esophageal Temperature Probes Insights From an Experimental Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.07.013 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohit K Turagam, Steve Miller, Sharan Prakash Sharma, Punit Prakash, Rakesh Gopinathannair, Prajwala Lakkireddy, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Jie Cheng, Andrea Natale, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 61% |
Germany | 4 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Turkey | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 54% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 25% |
Scientists | 4 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Librarian | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 60% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,056,310
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#488
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,950
of 363,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#19
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.