| Title |
Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-016-3630-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karine E. Pigeon, Etienne Cardinal, Gordon B. Stenhouse, Steeve D. Côté |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 4% |
| Iceland | 1 | 4% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Scientists | 11 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 25% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,730,524
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#195
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,808
of 300,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.