↓ Skip to main content

Chemopreventive potential of curcumin in prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 399)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Chemopreventive potential of curcumin in prostate cancer
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12263-009-0152-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Hélène Teiten, François Gaascht, Serge Eifes, Mario Dicato, Marc Diederich

Abstract

The long latency and high incidence of prostate carcinogenesis provides the opportunity to intervene with chemoprevention in order to prevent or eradicate prostate malignancies. We present here an overview of the chemopreventive potential of curcumin (diferuloylmethane), a well-known natural compound that exhibits therapeutic promise for prostate cancer. In fact, it interferes with prostate cancer proliferation and metastasis development through the down-regulation of androgen receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor, but also through the induction of cell cycle arrest. It regulates the inflammatory response through the inhibition of pro-inflammatory mediators and the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. These results are consistent with this compound's ability to up-induce pro-apoptotic proteins and to down-regulate the anti-apoptotic counterparts. Alone or in combination with TRAIL-mediated immunotherapy or radiotherapy, curcumin is also reported to be a good inducer of prostate cancer cell death by apoptosis. Curcumin appears thus as a non-toxic alternative for prostate cancer prevention, treatment or co-treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 24%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 41 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Chemistry 12 6%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 57 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,112,492
of 24,049,457 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#20
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,022
of 96,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,049,457 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.