↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

High-Sensitivity Troponins and Prognosis in Heart Failure Which Kind of Meta-Analysis Is Needed?

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
High-Sensitivity Troponins and Prognosis in Heart Failure Which Kind of Meta-Analysis Is Needed?
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.01.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Aimo, Giuseppe Vergaro, Michele Emdin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#1,415
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,938
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#46
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.