↓ Skip to main content

Microbiology of the phyllosphere: a playground for testing ecological concepts

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Microbiology of the phyllosphere: a playground for testing ecological concepts
Published in
Oecologia, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2138-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrin M. Meyer, Johan H. J. Leveau

Abstract

Many concepts and theories in ecology are highly debated, because it is often difficult to design decisive tests with sufficient replicates. Examples include biodiversity theories, succession concepts, invasion theories, coexistence theories, and concepts of life history strategies. Microbiological tests of ecological concepts are rapidly accumulating, but have yet to tap into their full potential to complement traditional macroecological theories. Taking the example of microbial communities on leaf surfaces (i.e. the phyllosphere), we show that most explorations of ecological concepts in this field of microbiology focus on autecology and population ecology, while community ecology remains understudied. Notable exceptions are first tests of the island biogeography theory and of biodiversity theories. Here, the phyllosphere provides the unique opportunity to set up replicated experiments, potentially moving fields such as biogeography, macroecology, and landscape ecology beyond theoretical and observational evidence. Future approaches should take advantage of the great range of spatial scales offered by the leaf surface by iteratively linking laboratory experiments with spatial simulation models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
Brazil 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 243 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 24%
Researcher 50 19%
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 56%
Environmental Science 23 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 59 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,445
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,636
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,444
of 132,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.