| Title |
Pectus deformities: tomographic analysis and clinical correlation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Skeletal Radiology, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00256-010-0874-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sydney Abrão Haje, Davi de Podestá Haje, Moacir Silva Neto, Guilherme de Souza e Cassia, Rodrigo Coimbra Batista, Gustavo Reis Alves de Oliveira, Tito Lívio Mundim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 28% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 28% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 72% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,478,822
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#436
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,398
of 166,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.