| Title |
The evolution of the Line of Variations at close encounters: an analytic approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10569-019-9924-2 |
| Authors |
G. B. Valsecchi, A. Del Vigna, M. Ceccaroni |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,978,848
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#69
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,484
of 349,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.