You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Penicillin V four times daily for five days versus three times daily for 10 days in patients with pharyngotonsillitis caused by group A streptococci: randomised controlled, open label, non-inferiority study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.l5337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gunilla Skoog Ståhlgren, Mia Tyrstrup, Charlotta Edlund, Christian G Giske, Sigvard Mölstad, Christer Norman, Karin Rystedt, Pär-Daniel Sundvall, Katarina Hedin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 415 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 62 | 15% |
| Spain | 53 | 13% |
| United States | 34 | 8% |
| Ireland | 17 | 4% |
| Canada | 14 | 3% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 6 | 1% |
| Mexico | 6 | 1% |
| Japan | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 55 | 13% |
| Unknown | 153 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 275 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 70 | 17% |
| Scientists | 62 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 19% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 49 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 306. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#114,263
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,763
of 65,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,246
of 364,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#45
of 815 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 815 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.