| Title |
Seed exchange networks for agrobiodiversity conservation. A review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13593-012-0089-6 |
| Authors |
Marco Pautasso, Guntra Aistara, Adeline Barnaud, Sophie Caillon, Pascal Clouvel, Oliver T. Coomes, Marc Delêtre, Elise Demeulenaere, Paola De Santis, Thomas Döring, Ludivine Eloy, Laure Emperaire, Eric Garine, Isabelle Goldringer, Devra Jarvis, Hélène I. Joly, Christian Leclerc, Selim Louafi, Pierre Martin, François Massol, Shawn McGuire, Doyle McKey, Christine Padoch, Clélia Soler, Mathieu Thomas, Sara Tramontini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 435 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 101 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 88 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 75 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 181 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 82 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 53 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 9% |
| Unknown | 82 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,499,159
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#433
of 887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,449
of 175,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.