↓ Skip to main content

Ion bipolar junction transistors

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ion bipolar junction transistors
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0913911107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klas Tybrandt, Karin C. Larsson, Agneta Richter-Dahlfors, Magnus Berggren

Abstract

Dynamic control of chemical microenvironments is essential for continued development in numerous fields of life sciences. Such control could be achieved with active chemical circuits for delivery of ions and biomolecules. As the basis for such circuitry, we report a solid-state ion bipolar junction transistor (IBJT) based on conducting polymers and thin films of anion- and cation-selective membranes. The IBJT is the ionic analogue to the conventional semiconductor BJT and is manufactured using standard microfabrication techniques. Transistor characteristics along with a model describing the principle of operation, in which an anionic base current amplifies a cationic collector current, are presented. By employing the IBJT as a bioelectronic circuit element for delivery of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, its efficacy in modulating neuronal cell signaling is demonstrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 181 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 26%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 34 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 60 30%
Physics and Astronomy 28 14%
Materials Science 26 13%
Chemistry 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 36 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,754,630
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22,558
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,749
of 98,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#142
of 721 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 721 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.