↓ Skip to main content

Conservation and divergence in Toll-like receptor 4-regulated gene expression in primary human versus mouse macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservation and divergence in Toll-like receptor 4-regulated gene expression in primary human versus mouse macrophages
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1110156109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Schroder, Katharine M. Irvine, Martin S. Taylor, Nilesh J. Bokil, Kim-Anh Le Cao, Kelly-Anne Masterman, Larisa I. Labzin, Colin A. Semple, Ronan Kapetanovic, Lynsey Fairbairn, Altuna Akalin, Geoffrey J. Faulkner, John Kenneth Baillie, Milena Gongora, Carsten O. Daub, Hideya Kawaji, Geoffrey J. McLachlan, Nick Goldman, Sean M. Grimmond, Piero Carninci, Harukazu Suzuki, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Boris Lenhard, David A. Hume, Matthew J. Sweet

Abstract

Evolutionary change in gene expression is generally considered to be a major driver of phenotypic differences between species. We investigated innate immune diversification by analyzing interspecies differences in the transcriptional responses of primary human and mouse macrophages to the Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS). By using a custom platform permitting cross-species interrogation coupled with deep sequencing of mRNA 5' ends, we identified extensive divergence in LPS-regulated orthologous gene expression between humans and mice (24% of orthologues were identified as "divergently regulated"). We further demonstrate concordant regulation of human-specific LPS target genes in primary pig macrophages. Divergently regulated orthologues were enriched for genes encoding cellular "inputs" such as cell surface receptors (e.g., TLR6, IL-7Rα) and functional "outputs" such as inflammatory cytokines/chemokines (e.g., CCL20, CXCL13). Conversely, intracellular signaling components linking inputs to outputs were typically concordantly regulated. Functional consequences of divergent gene regulation were confirmed by showing LPS pretreatment boosts subsequent TLR6 responses in mouse but not human macrophages, in keeping with mouse-specific TLR6 induction. Divergently regulated genes were associated with a large dynamic range of gene expression, and specific promoter architectural features (TATA box enrichment, CpG island depletion). Surprisingly, regulatory divergence was also associated with enhanced interspecies promoter conservation. Thus, the genes controlled by complex, highly conserved promoters that facilitate dynamic regulation are also the most susceptible to evolutionary change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 249 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Researcher 52 20%
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 48 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 35%
Immunology and Microbiology 33 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 53 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,920,558
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#86,241
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,280
of 164,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#600
of 842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.