↓ Skip to main content

Minimal Length Scale Scenarios for Quantum Gravity

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 150)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
505 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Minimal Length Scale Scenarios for Quantum Gravity
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, January 2013
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2013-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine Hossenfelder

Abstract

We review the question of whether the fundamental laws of nature limit our ability to probe arbitrarily short distances. First, we examine what insights can be gained from thought experiments for probes of shortest distances, and summarize what can be learned from different approaches to a theory of quantum gravity. Then we discuss some models that have been developed to implement a minimal length scale in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. These models have entered the literature as the generalized uncertainty principle or the modified dispersion relation, and have allowed the study of the effects of a minimal length scale in quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, thermodynamics, black-hole physics and cosmology. Finally, we touch upon the question of ways to circumvent the manifestation of a minimal length scale in short-distance physics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Researcher 19 15%
Unspecified 15 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 71 55%
Unspecified 16 12%
Philosophy 5 4%
Mathematics 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#855,596
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#11
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,822
of 293,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them