↓ Skip to main content

Recent Findings on Peer Group Influences on Adolescent Smoking

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Prevention, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
306 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Recent Findings on Peer Group Influences on Adolescent Smoking
Published in
Journal of Prevention, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10935-010-0220-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce G. Simons-Morton, Tilda Farhat

Abstract

This review addresses peer group influences on adolescent smoking with a particular focus on recently published longitudinal studies that have investigated the topic. Specifically, we examine the theoretical explanations for how social influence works with respect to adolescent smoking; discuss the association between peer and adolescent smoking; consider socialization and selection processes with respect to smoking; investigate the relative influence of best friends, close friends, and crowd affiliations; and examine parenting behaviors that could buffer the effects of peer influence. Our review indicates the following with respect to adolescent smoking: (a) substantial peer group homogeneity of smoking behavior; (b) support for both socialization and selection effects, although evidence is somewhat stronger for selection; (c) an interactive influence of best friends, peer groups, and crowd affiliation; and (d) an indirect protective effect of positive parenting practices against the uptake of adolescent smoking. We conclude with implications for research and prevention programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 370 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 12%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Other 69 18%
Unknown 76 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 23%
Social Sciences 63 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 2%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 97 26%