You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ヒトパピローマウイルスワクチン接種後に生じる副反応の科学的解明 ―自然史,他覚的検査所見,ワクチンの諸問題―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Autonomic Nervous System, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.32272/ans.56.3_093 |
| Authors |
平井 利明, 黒岩 義之 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 12 | 32% |
| Unknown | 25 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,733,632
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from The Autonomic Nervous System
#1
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,761
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Autonomic Nervous System
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them