↓ Skip to main content

Enrichment planting to improve habitat quality and conservation value of tropical rainforest fragments

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Enrichment planting to improve habitat quality and conservation value of tropical rainforest fragments
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10531-016-1100-3
Authors

Kok Loong Yeong, Glen Reynolds, Jane K. Hill

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 26%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 39%
Environmental Science 31 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,813,546
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,116
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,208
of 304,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#22
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.