You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality of the diagnostic process in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of bladder or kidney cancer: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yin Zhou, Marije van Melle, Hardeep Singh, Willie Hamilton, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Fiona M Walter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 52% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,581,536
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,943
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,964
of 363,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#104
of 835 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 835 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.