↓ Skip to main content

No Contradictions, But Directions for Further Research: A Reply to Hellmer and Stenson (2016)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
No Contradictions, But Directions for Further Research: A Reply to Hellmer and Stenson (2016)
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10508-016-0723-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian A. Oldmeadow, Barnaby J. Dixson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Master 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Psychology 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,155,503
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,473
of 3,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,324
of 298,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#24
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.