| Title |
Fungal microbiome in colorectal cancer: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Updates in Surgery, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13304-019-00683-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arun Anandakumar, Gianluca Pellino, Paris Tekkis, Christos Kontovounisios |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| Italy | 3 | 10% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 33% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,293,866
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Updates in Surgery
#51
of 701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,840
of 355,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Updates in Surgery
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 701 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.