| Title |
Doubled haploid technology for line development in maize: technical advances and prospects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-019-03433-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vijay Chaikam, Willem Molenaar, Albrecht E. Melchinger, Prasanna M. Boddupalli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Zimbabwe | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 68% |
| Scientists | 11 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 15% |
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 87 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 94 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,383,459
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#52
of 3,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,514
of 357,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.