You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A large data resource of genomic copy number variation across neurodevelopmental disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Genomic Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41525-019-0098-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mehdi Zarrei, Christie L. Burton, Worrawat Engchuan, Edwin J. Young, Edward J. Higginbotham, Jeffrey R. MacDonald, Brett Trost, Ada J. S. Chan, Susan Walker, Sylvia Lamoureux, Tracy Heung, Bahareh A. Mojarad, Barbara Kellam, Tara Paton, Muhammad Faheem, Karin Miron, Chao Lu, Ting Wang, Kozue Samler, Xiaolin Wang, Gregory Costain, Ny Hoang, Giovanna Pellecchia, John Wei, Rohan V. Patel, Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram, Maian Roifman, Daniele Merico, Tara Goodale, Irene Drmic, Marsha Speevak, Jennifer L. Howe, Ryan K. C. Yuen, Janet A. Buchanan, Jacob A. S. Vorstman, Christian R. Marshall, Richard F. Wintle, David R. Rosenberg, Gregory L. Hanna, Marc Woodbury-Smith, Cheryl Cytrynbaum, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Mayada Elsabbagh, Janine Flanagan, Bridget A. Fernandez, Melissa T. Carter, Peter Szatmari, Wendy Roberts, Jason Lerch, Xudong Liu, Rob Nicolson, Stelios Georgiades, Rosanna Weksberg, Paul D. Arnold, Anne S. Bassett, Jennifer Crosbie, Russell Schachar, Dimitri J. Stavropoulos, Evdokia Anagnostou, Stephen W. Scherer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 19% |
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| Ireland | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 17 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 9% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 73 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,892,355
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from npj Genomic Medicine
#81
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,717
of 366,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Genomic Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.