↓ Skip to main content

In vitro expression and analysis of the 826 human G protein-coupled receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
In vitro expression and analysis of the 826 human G protein-coupled receptors
Published in
Protein & Cell, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13238-016-0263-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuechen Lv, Junlin Liu, Qiaoyun Shi, Qiwen Tan, Dong Wu, John J Skinner, Angela L Walker, Lixia Zhao, Xiangxiang Gu, Na Chen, Lu Xue, Pei Si, Lu Zhang, Zeshi Wang, Vsevolod Katritch, Zhi-jie Liu, Raymond C Stevens

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in all human physiological systems where they are responsible for transducing extracellular signals into cells. GPCRs signal in response to a diverse array of stimuli including light, hormones, and lipids, where these signals affect downstream cascades to impact both health and disease states. Yet, despite their importance as therapeutic targets, detailed molecular structures of only 30 GPCRs have been determined to date. A key challenge to their structure determination is adequate protein expression. Here we report the quantification of protein expression in an insect cell expression system for all 826 human GPCRs using two different fusion constructs. Expression characteristics are analyzed in aggregate and among each of the five distinct subfamilies. These data can be used to identify trends related to GPCR expression between different fusion constructs and between different GPCR families, and to prioritize lead candidates for future structure determination feasibility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 13 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 13%
Chemistry 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,238,975
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#188
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,065
of 299,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.