| Title |
Anomalous climatic conditions associated with the El Niño Modoki during boreal winter of 2009
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-011-1108-z |
| Authors |
J. V. Ratnam, S. K. Behera, Y. Masumoto, K. Takahashi, T. Yamagata |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2011.
All research outputs
#5,551,040
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,706
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,596
of 111,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.