↓ Skip to main content

Production of biorenewable styrene: utilization of biomass-derived sugars and insights into toxicity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Production of biorenewable styrene: utilization of biomass-derived sugars and insights into toxicity
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10295-016-1734-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jieni Lian, Rebekah McKenna, Marjorie R Rover, David R Nielsen, Zhiyou Wen, Laura R Jarboe

Abstract

Fermentative production of styrene from glucose has been previously demonstrated in Escherichia coli. Here, we demonstrate the production of styrene from the sugars derived from lignocellulosic biomass depolymerized by fast pyrolysis. A previously engineered styrene-producing strain was further engineered for utilization of the anhydrosugar levoglucosan via expression of levoglucosan kinase. The resulting strain produced 240 ± 3 mg L(-1) styrene from pure levoglucosan, similar to the 251 ± 3 mg L(-1) produced from glucose. When provided at a concentration of 5 g L(-1), pyrolytic sugars supported styrene production at titers similar to those from pure sugars, demonstrating the feasibility of producing this important industrial chemical from biomass-derived sugars. However, the toxicity of contaminant compounds in the biomass-derived sugars and styrene itself limit further gains in production. Styrene toxicity is generally believed to be due to membrane damage. Contrary to this prevailing wisdom, our quantitative assessment during challenge with up to 200 mg L(-1) of exogenously provided styrene showed little change in membrane integrity; membrane disruption was observed only during styrene production. Membrane fluidity was also quantified during styrene production, but no changes were observed relative to the non-producing control strain. This observation that styrene production is much more damaging to the membrane integrity than challenge with exogenously supplied styrene provides insight into the mechanism of styrene toxicity and emphasizes the importance of verifying proposed toxicity mechanisms during production instead of relying upon results obtained during exogenous challenge.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 24%
Engineering 9 14%
Chemistry 9 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Chemical Engineering 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#575
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,918
of 311,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.