You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of Parents, Parenting and the Family Environment in Children’s Post-Disaster Mental Health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Psychiatry Reports, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11920-016-0691-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa E. Cobham, Brett McDermott, Divna Haslam, Matthew R. Sanders |
| Abstract |
There is widespread support for the hypothesis that, post-disaster, children's mental health is impacted-at least in part-via the impact on parents, parenting, parent-child interactions, and the family environment. To some degree, the enthusiasm with which this hypothesis is held outstrips the evidence examining it. The current paper critically evaluates the empirical evidence for this hypothesis and concludes that although limited (both in terms of number of existing studies and methodological flaws), the extant literature indicates some parent-related variables, as well as some aspects of the family environment are likely to constitute risk or protective factors for children. Given that parenting is modifiable, it is proposed that the identified parent- and family-related factors represent important therapeutic targets, and a universal post-disaster parenting intervention (Disaster Recovery Triple P) is described. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 23% |
| Unknown | 70 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 61 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 87 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,018,402
of 25,202,494 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#123
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,164
of 275,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,202,494 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.