↓ Skip to main content

Labeling nanoparticles: Dye leakage and altered cellular uptake

Overview of attention for article published in Cytometry Part A, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 1,372)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Labeling nanoparticles: Dye leakage and altered cellular uptake
Published in
Cytometry Part A, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/cyto.a.22853
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sofie Snipstad, Sjoerd Hak, Habib Baghirov, Einar Sulheim, Ýrr Mørch, Sylvie Lélu, Eva von Haartman, Marcus Bäck, K. Peter R. Nilsson, Andrey S. Klymchenko, Catharina de Lange Davies, Andreas K. O. Åslund

Abstract

In vitro and in vivo behavior of nanoparticles (NPs) is often studied by tracing the NPs with fluorescent dyes. This requires stable incorporation of dyes within the NPs, as dye leakage may give a wrong interpretation of NP biodistribution, cellular uptake, and intracellular distribution. Furthermore, NP labeling with trace amounts of dye should not alter NP properties such as interactions with cells or tissues. To allow for versatile NP studies with a variety of fluorescence-based assays, labeling of NPs with different dyes is desirable. Hence, when new dyes are introduced, simple and fast screening methods to assess labeling stability and NP-cell interactions are needed. For this purpose, we have used a previously described generic flow cytometry assay; incubation of cells with NPs at 4 and 37°C. Cell-NP interaction is confirmed by cellular fluorescence after 37°C incubation, and NP-dye retention is confirmed when no cellular fluorescence is detected at 4°C. Three different NP-platforms labeled with six different dyes were screened, and a great variability in dye retention was observed. Surprisingly, incorporation of trace amounts of certain dyes was found to reduce or even inhibit NP uptake. This work highlights the importance of thoroughly evaluating every dye-NP combination before pursuing NP-based applications. © 2016 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 32%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 20 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 42 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,078,753
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Cytometry Part A
#37
of 1,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,146
of 305,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytometry Part A
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.