↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical determinants of 100-m sprint running performance

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
93 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
313 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
780 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical determinants of 100-m sprint running performance
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00421-012-2379-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Benoît Morin, Muriel Bourdin, Pascal Edouard, Nicolas Peyrot, Pierre Samozino, Jean-René Lacour

Abstract

Sprint mechanics and field 100-m performances were tested in 13 subjects including 9 non-specialists, 3 French national-level sprinters and a world-class sprinter, to further study the mechanical factors associated with sprint performance. 6-s sprints performed on an instrumented treadmill allowed continuous recording of step kinematics, ground reaction forces (GRF), and belt velocity and computation of mechanical power output and linear force-velocity relationships. An index of the force application technique was computed as the slope of the linear relationship between the decrease in the ratio of horizontal-to-resultant GRF and the increase in velocity. Mechanical power output was positively correlated to mean 100-m speed (P < 0.01), as was the theoretical maximal velocity production capability (P < 0.011), whereas the theoretical maximal force production capability was not. The ability to apply the resultant force backward during acceleration was positively correlated to 100-m performance (r (s) > 0.683; P < 0.018), but the magnitude of resultant force was not (P = 0.16). Step frequency, contact and swing time were significantly correlated to acceleration and 100-m performance (positively for the former, negatively for the two latter, all P < 0.05), whereas aerial time and step length were not (all P > 0.21). Last, anthropometric data of body mass index and lower-limb-to-height ratio showed no significant correlation with 100-m performance. We concluded that the main mechanical determinants of 100-m performance were (1) a "velocity-oriented" force-velocity profile, likely explained by (2) a higher ability to apply the resultant GRF vector with a forward orientation over the acceleration, and (3) a higher step frequency resulting from a shorter contact time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 780 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 770 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 143 18%
Student > Bachelor 130 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 12%
Researcher 45 6%
Other 40 5%
Other 128 16%
Unknown 201 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 413 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 4%
Engineering 24 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 2%
Other 47 6%
Unknown 222 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#480,780
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#126
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,141
of 170,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.