↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Perceptions of palliative care among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
161 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
Title
Perceptions of palliative care among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2016
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.151171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilla Zimmermann, Nadia Swami, Monika Krzyzanowska, Natasha Leighl, Anne Rydall, Gary Rodin, Ian Tannock, Breffni Hannon

Abstract

Early palliative care is increasingly recommended but seldom practised. We sought to examine perceptions of palliative care among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. After conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial of early palliative care versus standard care for patients with advanced cancer, we approached patients and their caregivers to participate in semistructured interviews seeking to assess, qualitatively, their attitudes and perceptions about palliative care. We used the grounded theory method for data collection and analysis. A total of 48 patients (26 intervention, 22 control) and 23 caregivers (14 intervention, 9 control) completed interviews. Participants' initial perceptions of palliative care in both trial arms were of death, hopelessness, dependency and end-of-life comfort care for inpatients. These perceptions provoked fear and avoidance, and often originated from interactions with health care professionals. During the trial, those in the intervention arm developed a broader concept of palliative care as "ongoing care" that improved their "quality of living" but still felt that the term itself carried a stigma. Participants in the intervention group emphasized the need for palliative care to be reframed and better explained by health care professionals. Participants in the control group generally considered it pointless to rename palliative care, but many in the intervention group stated emphatically that a different name was necessary in the early outpatient setting. There is a strong stigma attached to palliative care, which may persist even after positive experiences with an early palliative care intervention. Education of the public, patients and health care providers is paramount if early integration of palliative care is to be successful.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 394 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Researcher 37 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Other 29 7%
Other 71 18%
Unknown 133 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 89 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 88 22%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Psychology 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 149 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 240. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#157,720
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#283
of 9,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,903
of 313,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#8
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.