↓ Skip to main content

A rectal cancer organoid platform to study individual responses to chemoradiation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
260 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
328 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A rectal cancer organoid platform to study individual responses to chemoradiation
Published in
Nature Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41591-019-0584-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karuna Ganesh, Chao Wu, Kevin P. O’Rourke, Bryan C. Szeglin, Youyun Zheng, Charles-Etienne Gabriel Sauvé, Mohammad Adileh, Isaac Wasserman, Michael R. Marco, Amanda S. Kim, Maha Shady, Francisco Sanchez-Vega, Wouter R. Karthaus, Helen H. Won, Seo-Hyun Choi, Raphael Pelossof, Afsar Barlas, Peter Ntiamoah, Emmanouil Pappou, Arthur Elghouayel, James S. Strong, Chin-Tung Chen, Jennifer W. Harris, Martin R. Weiser, Garrett M. Nash, Jose G. Guillem, Iris H. Wei, Richard N. Kolesnick, Harini Veeraraghavan, Eduardo J. Ortiz, Iva Petkovska, Andrea Cercek, Katia O. Manova-Todorova, Leonard B. Saltz, Jessica A. Lavery, Ronald P. DeMatteo, Joan Massagué, Philip B. Paty, Rona Yaeger, Xi Chen, Sujata Patil, Hans Clevers, Michael F. Berger, Scott W. Lowe, Jinru Shia, Paul B. Romesser, Lukas E. Dow, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Charles L. Sawyers, J. Joshua Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 260 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 334 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 20%
Researcher 50 15%
Student > Master 28 8%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 92 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 92 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 109 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#238,965
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#947
of 9,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,049
of 365,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#24
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.