↓ Skip to main content

Prenatal brain MRI of fetuses with Zika virus infection

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Prenatal brain MRI of fetuses with Zika virus infection
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00247-016-3619-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prisca Guillemette-Artur, Marianne Besnard, Dominique Eyrolle-Guignot, Jean-Marie Jouannic, Catherine Garel

Abstract

An outbreak of Zika virus was observed in French Polynesia in 2013-2014. Maternal Zika virus infection has been associated with fetal microcephaly and severe cerebral damage. To analyze the MRI cerebral findings in fetuses with intrauterine Zika virus infection. We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data. Inclusion criteria comprised cases with (1) estimated conception date between June 2013 and May 2014, (2) available US and MRI scans revealing severe fetal brain lesions and (3) positive polymerase chain reaction for Zika virus in the amniotic fluid. We recorded pregnancy history of Zika virus infection and analyzed US and MRI scans. Three out of 12 cases of severe cerebral lesions fulfilled all inclusion criteria. History of maternal Zika virus infection had been documented in two cases. Calcifications and ventriculomegaly were present at US in all cases. MRI showed micrencephaly (n = 3), low cerebellar biometry (n = 2), occipital subependymal pseudocysts (n = 2), polymicrogyria with laminar necrosis and opercular dysplasia (n = 3), absent (n = 1) or hypoplastic (n = 1) corpus callosum and hypoplastic brainstem (n = 1). Severe cerebral damage was observed in our series, with indirect findings suggesting that the germinal matrix is the principal target for Zika virus. The lesions are very similar to severe forms of congenital cytomegalovirus and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 133 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Professor 11 8%
Other 35 25%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,251,439
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#490
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,592
of 299,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.