You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Parasympathetic Nervous System Dysfunction, as Identified by Pupil Light Reflex, and Its Possible Connection to Hearing Impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0153566 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Wang, Adriana A. Zekveld, Graham Naylor, Barbara Ohlenforst, Elise P. Jansma, Artur Lorens, Thomas Lunner, Sophia E. Kramer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Engineering | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,075,187
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#37,290
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,573
of 317,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#922
of 5,112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.