↓ Skip to main content

Topography of Human Erogenous Zones

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
46 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Topography of Human Erogenous Zones
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10508-016-0745-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauri Nummenmaa, Juulia T. Suvilehto, Enrico Glerean, Pekka Santtila, Jari K. Hietanen

Abstract

Touching is a powerful means for eliciting sexual arousal. Here, we establish the topographical organization of bodily regions triggering sexual arousal in humans. A total of 704 participants were shown images of same and opposite sex bodies and asked to color the bodily regions whose touching they or members of the opposite sex would experience as sexually arousing while masturbating or having sex with a partner. Resulting erogenous zone maps (EZMs) revealed that the whole body was sensitive to sexual touching, with erogenous hotspots consisting of genitals, breasts, and anus. The EZM area was larger while having sex with a partner versus while masturbating, and was also dependent on sexual desire and heterosexual and homosexual interest levels. We conclude that tactile stimulation of practically all bodily regions may trigger sexual arousal. Extension of the erogenous zones while having sex with a partner may reflect the role of touching in maintenance of reproductive pair bonds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 24 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 29%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 31 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#431,032
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#254
of 3,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,900
of 310,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#9
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.