↓ Skip to main content

The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robyn L. Tate, Michael Perdices, Ulrike Rosenkoetter, William Shadish, Sunita Vohra, David H. Barlow, Robert Horner, Alan Kazdin, Thomas Kratochwill, Skye McDonald, Margaret Sampson, Larissa Shamseer, Leanne Togher, Richard Albin, Catherine Backman, Jacinta Douglas, Jonathan J. Evans, David Gast, Rumen Manolov, Geoffrey Mitchell, Lyndsey Nickels, Jane Nikles, Tamara Ownsworth, Miranda Rose, Christopher H. Schmid, Barbara Wilson

Abstract

We developed a reporting guideline to provide authors with guidance about what should be reported when writing a paper for publication in a scientific journal using a particular type of research design: the single-case experimental design. This report describes the methods used to develop the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016. As a result of 2 online surveys and a 2-day meeting of experts, the SCRIBE 2016 checklist was developed, which is a set of 26 items that authors need to address when writing about single-case research. This article complements the more detailed SCRIBE 2016 Explanation and Elaboration article (Tate et al., 2016) that provides a rationale for each of the items and examples of adequate reporting from the literature. Both these resources will assist authors to prepare reports of single-case research with clarity, completeness, accuracy, and transparency. They will also provide journal reviewers and editors with a practical checklist against which such reports may be critically evaluated. We recommend that the SCRIBE 2016 is used by authors preparing manuscripts describing single-case research for publication, as well as journal reviewers and editors who are evaluating such manuscripts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,210,739
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#1,772
of 4,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,139
of 313,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#23
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.