Title |
Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction Device for Body Contouring: 97 Patients under Local Anesthesia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00266-011-9846-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Spero J. Theodorou, Robert J. Paresi, Christopher T. Chia |
Abstract |
Radiofrequency-assisted liposuction involves the delivery of a controlled amount of energy to treated tissue resulting in fat liquefaction, accompanying hemostasis, and skin tightening. The purpose of this study is to report experience with a larger sample size using the BodyTite™ radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) platform, and its first use with local tumescent anesthesia. The Bodytite™ device is currently awaiting FDA approval. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 56% |
Psychology | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,128,940
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#572
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,366
of 161,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.